Hkoll was developed to collate several text versions with one ›main‹ version and calculate an apparatus criticus from the differences. Deviations between the textus constitutus and one or more transcribed witnesses are classified as addition, omission, transposition or plain variance.
Hkoll was developed to collate several text versions with one ›main‹ version and calculate an apparatus criticus from the differences. Deviations between the textus constitutus (called »model«) and one or more transcribed witnesses (called »images«) are classified as addition, omission, transposition or – if none of the former applies – plain variance.
Running Hkoll implies the following steps:
The main difference to other collation tools is that Hkoll supports a highly automated workflow. Indeed, the idea is that Hkoll calculates the complete edition (taken as information, not as a specific representation, cf. Thomas Stäcker: A digital edition is not visible) from the given input – model, images, normalisation rules, standoff – without any human interception afterwards. All decisions taken by the editors are instead included into the input files; Hkoll then derives the consequences.
The advantage of such an automated workflow is that it enables additions, corrections, and revisions at any time without the need of manually adjusting the apparatus criticus. This is done by Hkoll in short time (seconds to minutes).
Demo: https://github.com/omsinf/hkoll-demo
Paper: Oliver Schrader, Sebastian Gassmann, Tessa Gengnagel, "Automatisierung und CI/CD in digitalen Editionen am Beispiel des Conciliator," in: Konferenzabstracts der DHd2024 Quo Vadis DH?, Passau, 21 February 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10698406.